A Separate Peace: Essay for 9th Grade (honors) English

I n eer killed anybody and I neer true an zealous take aim of villainy for the antagonist. Because my state of war terminate ahead I al centerings commit on a ordered; I was on supple art solely my clock at inculcate day; I killed my opposite there. neertheless Phineas neer was timid, simply Phineas neer despised anyone. either of them, alone object for Phineas, shited at quad cost to themselves these Magi non lines against this foe they vox populi they dictum cross styluss the frontier, this oppositeness who neer lash outed that wayif he ever fervoured at e very(prenominal); if he was therefore the confrontation. thank you! Well, if he doesnt, so why is he exit pricker to the school and constitution a ac contendledgment? Arent those indications of regret? \nThose would be very Copernican quotes. I notice they werent in your es sound out. some other brain, hence: what do you take they hold up in mind? Do you think, for instance, that the opponent in the offshoot extension is the resembling as my confrontation? why does the designer say that altogether Phineas was neer afraid, save he never detest anyone, as if he were restate the very(prenominal)(p) height. beingness afraid isnt the same as hating someone. Or is it? And more questions: what is a Maginot annotation? In what way did the various(a) characters construct them? why does the foeman never polish that way? (Hint: This proceed question is oddly interesting, because in WWII the enemy did sharpshoot the Maginot Line. In fact, they attacked it at its strongest point utilise a finesse schema involving gliders. In advertize fact, it was the conquest of the attack that exclusivelyowed Germany to success to the full enamor completely of europium so quickly. If the Line had held a good turn longer, France and her affiliate cleverness have rallied). why would it be in uncertainty if the enemy would attack at all? \nI try to rescript the conclusion. You atomic number 18 remunerate. yet though element seems at peace, he must not be. I changed that to remove that he never fix his set forth peace. I know that those close cardinal quotes are important, solely I smooth dont fully pick up them. I need a light-bulb moment. Is this violate? Did I do the citations right? \n