Situations and styles of leadership | Free essay | Management essays

Situations and elans of present place Free essay focus essaysIntroduction drawing cardship has been the twingeic of reciprocation and look into in the Organizational Behavior literature. A non bad(p) collection of incompatible theoretical frame flex has been substantial to take out elements of lead. Incessant self assessment, information, guidance, experience and never ending process of self-study develops unspoiled attractions in a society. Many companies ar facing elevated turnover, absenteeism, low team spirit among employees and legion(predicate) early(a) such issues related to the joke environment. For every last(predicate)(a) these difficultys companies choose proper impelling lead. The purpose of this reputation is to defecate an in-depth insight on the major look for findings of an effective attractors elans and situations and their role in make-upal proceeding by reviewing the research literature.In this review paper giving medication al bring to passance is existence judged by the pauperismal level of the employees and employment satisfaction factor. So this review paper gives a clear insight concerning (the theories of attractions) factors that get ahead leadinghip among employees which is then middlemaned with organizational procedure. This review paper entrust help debaters to look at the major concerns which lead to majuscule leading and how to handle challenges and unexpected situations occurring in an organization. impressive leadership deal be expressed where leaders influence stem members, chase or subordinates in a itinerary that this leave behind help them to achieve common goals.Leadership and its MeaningAs this world is ever-changing so is the interpretation of leadership. Over the years leadership has been eviscerated according to the circumstances. Effective leader is the unrivalled who is fitted to match his level of skills to the maturity of the subordinates. The word h as been defined in so many terms that openhanded a single definition go out non be justified. In tell to actualise the accredited meaning of leadership star has to study the topic itself thoroughly. Todays world is so complex and fast changing that we rearnot just stick to atomic number 53 definition of the leadership. As the competition from the other firms comes in the organization so the ideas, so they broaden the meaning of what leadership is. As described by Thomas B. Allen (1988) the word leadership refers to a process of kind influence, in which one just about(a)body raft enlist the aid and apply of others in the mend upment of a common labour. A much than(prenominal) apt and inclusive definition with attentiveness to followers comes from Robert J. House (1996) who states that leadership is ultimately about creating a way for concourse to contribute to reservation aboutthing extra routine happen. Another definition comes from literature which states tha t effective leadership is the ability to successfully integrate and increase avail subject resources inwardly the inbred and external environment for the attainment of organizational or societal goals. Kirkpatrick Locke (1991) suggested with their study that effective leader is an individual with the capacity to consistently succeed in a inclined condition and be recognized as meeting the expectations of an organization or society. The analysis suggests that effective leadership stern hold back positive dissemble on overall get alongance.Effective leadership nominate be described as giving a vision to the police squad up-members and developing the path for the followers to achieve the supreme output. In society to gain high level of organizational performance leaders pay to course naked, innovative and challenging techniques to guide, motivate and manage the subordinates. Leadership is all about performance of the subordinates, groups, and organizations good lead ership promotes valuable group performance which in turn leads to high growth and expansion of a firm.A leaders background, life experiences, and daily communications define his or her leadership expressive style. The difference amid a good leader and a great leader is his or her ability to adapt to change. In an organization usually leaders and subordinates ply together to understand the behavior of all(prenominal) other and turn up to manage their behavior to produce more beneficial results, Davis RV Tim Luthans. F (1979). gibe to Avery, G.C. Jing F.F. (2008) due to the complexity of leadership it is broken into five opposite perspectives competency, behavioral, contingency, transformational, and implicit. Leadership is a method by which an individual persuades other lot in a group to achieve an objective and leads the organization in a way that makes the team members interconnected and coherent. Bass (1989 1990) explains trinity types of theories of leadership. jibe to him there is a trait guess which states that in some race wee in born traits which lead them to accommodate a leader. Second theory is great event theory which is related to the crisis or cardinal event. It states that sometimes some major events or crisis precede their marks on an individual personality which whitethorn bring out leadership qualities in an ordinary person, do him an extraordinary leader. Third is Transformational leadership theory which is most widely accepted theory of fresh years. In it people by choice prefer the path of becoming leaders with learning and proper education. Leadership has certain(prenominal)(a) set attributes like values, ethics, belief, association and skill etc., which if followed properly can make an individual a good leader.Robert D. Rossel (1970) in his paper argued that there argon two kinds of preferences, instru kind and communicatory, habituated to the effective leadership in an organization. According to him, leadersh ip orientation depends on the nature of organization. Different organizations carry different kind of leadership orientation among supervisors and managers. He further declared, if we take an example of organizations like mental hospitals, prisons etc where the environment is more segregated and isolated, the most successful leadership will be in semi-formal and expressive. Whereas formal and instrumental leadership will be required in organizations dealing in production and process side. Author explained the instrumental orientation to leadership as one which is more task orientated, the main cerebrate of such type of leadership in an organization is to motivate team members, to maintain product feel. While, expressive orientation to leadership is all about getting along with the group members and the conduct of perverseness, and inattentiveness in leadership may interfere with the goals of organization. Author stated that the orientation to leadership in like manner vary dep ending upon the projection loading required for any token organization. According to the findings of this paper, this can be affirmed that organizations where there is a high labor commitment demonstrate a very definite instrumental orientation in top guidance (F-Ratio 2.39, Mean 1.25) and an expressive orientation in lower supervisors (Mean -0.17).In terms of lord performance, effective leadership leads to people who find fill upment in their patronages, reach with enthusiasm passion, and perform quality work, with innovation and creativity. Effective leaders ask to be able to endorse ideas and concepts as well as promote ideologies. Another quality countn in efficient leaders is how they can shift their groups attention towards the goals and objectives at hand by providing strategies regarding how to achieve the desired goals. They not only provide the physical resources required for the job such as tools and administrative or skilful assistance, but as well the psycho logical ones such as motivation, education and correspondence. The most efficient leaders can excessively adapt to different environments according to the need of the hour and provide their workers with all the support and attention they require in rescript to successfully fulfill the task at hand.Hogan Kaiser (2005) defined leadership as a process of team building in which every member work well according to the set rules defined by the leader to exceed the competition. They further lushd regarding the conventional definition of leadership over time, which defined leadership as the person who has the ability to influence others can be a leader but according to the author group performance should be the monetary standard of leadership. They stated that in order to judge and assess the leadership one should look at the team performance. Three implications of this view should be noted. First, leadership requires influencing individuals volitionly to contribute to the good of the group. Second, leadership requires coordinating and the guiding group (by adopting the most appropriate way) to achieve its goals. Finally, goals vary by organization and their life cycles. Leadership is the most essential item required for creating a team out of a group of individuals. One of the most imperative qualities of a good leader is that they can make individuals on team a single unit leading to synergy. Effective leaders can convince their team members to concentrate on their role within the team rather than their individual goals. An indicator regarding the success of a leader is the success of his or her followers. The light upon difference in explaining the long term performances of the firms is largely attributed to an extraordinary leadership. Superior performance is achieved when an organization is generating the maximum level of profitability possible with the help of three key determinants efficiency, adaptations, and human resources. A business environment is more credibly to succeed when it has people with high levels of skills, commitment and mutual trusts. Many times leaders performance is constrained with respect to the nature and size of an organization. all(prenominal) leader performs within the set limits of an organization, which actually hinder the real outcomes. In other words, the structure and size of a firm baseally depicts the period of leaders performance.Organizational PerformanceIn order to understand the meaning of organizational performance first we have to look at the definition of organization. Aldrich (1979) in his news organizations and environment explained organization in three ways a) goal oriented b) boundary maintaining, and c) activity system. By goal directed he means that the end objective of all organizations is to earn profit and to maximize the wealth of sh bes holders. Members of an organization behaves as if they have some defined goal, all of them work to achieve some specified purpose. This means members of an organization be task-oriented do not merely work for social interaction. goal-directed behavior and deliberate design of activity systems distinguish organizations from other groups, such as families, friendship circles, audiences and hatful publics. By boundary maintain he meant that organizations have defined clearly among the members of an organizations and non-members. And all members of an organization work collectively under the supervision of some authority to obtain defined goals. Activity system can be described as a system in an organization where all members ar charge some activities to achieve some predefined goals within boundary of an organization.The major component of effective organization is having a talent management team, which will be headed by a leader. Organizational performance need to be studied in relation to the status of employee satisfaction to assess how good the firm is doing in the market. In order to evaluate the authorizat ion and efficiency of an Organization one has to look at the performance of the workers. Employees perform best when they ar highly motivated resulting in increased number of customers and high growth rate.Thomas. B. Alan. (1988) entailed through and through his study that organizational performance is highly variable term. He further argued that organizational performance depends on various kinds of factors such as leaders styles and behavior, leader-subordinate relation, firm size etc. which definitely has a great carry on on the performance of a firm. One of the main power behind this is that assets like leadership behaviors, organization culture, skill and k today-how, and motivation are seen as the most important factors of strength in those firms which involve group, procedures and organizational performance, Avery, G.C. Jing F.F. (2008). Therefore, leaders and their leadership style influence both their subordinates and organizational outcomes.Organizational performance i ncreases if the employees are highly motivated and satisfied with team leader and their work. As per Ohio State University research successful leadership has two behavioral dimensions which play very important role, a. Consideration in this kind of behavior leader of a group is touch on about the team members. This aspect of leadership is linked with leadership traits of kindliness, parole with subordinates, appreciation and respect of team members and supportiveness, b. Initiating Structure this type of leaders behavior is more towards work do. They are more come to about work and task. Leaders who fall into this class of style are overmuch planned, coordinated, and clear about their goals, criticize poor work, and always pressurize subordinates to work more effectively.Leadership StylesEffective leadership involves the study of different styles of leaders. The literature suggests that some types of leadership styles are preferred over others. This is specially true under d ifferent workings conditions as well as the subordinates relation with the leader. Rotemberg. J.J Saloner. G. (1993) think through their study that leadership style of a firm is take oned by the stakeholders to maximize the ex ante profits. According to their study the leader of the group (team Manager) exercises his power in different ways. They considered leadership styles as a) Locus of fit, internal locus of control in which leader feels whatever happens is because of their own strategies and actions, external locus of control in which they feel environment is responsible for whatever happening in their lives, b) Flexibility, fewer leaders are pliant and they are open to new ideas and thoughts, whereas some leaders have been identified as rigid. CEOs whose style is more rigid angle to lead firms with fewer innovations and do not delegate easily. Leadership style includes not only motivating and providing direction to the people but also giveing the plans. The needs of th e employees play an important role in identifying the start that a leader uses. An often overlooked quality within leaders is helpfulness. They not only need to come along teamwork but also provide all sorts of support required to their team members. Studies also suggest that there is evidence that states considerate leaders tend to perform better. Leaders need to use multiple approaches while dealing with their subordinates, some of which include relationship development, training and professionalism of subordinates and time allotments. The three well known styles of leaderships are authoritative, participative and delegating, James D. Boulgarides William A. Cohen (2001).AuthoritativeThis is a style where the leader is in recognise control and orders his subordinates regarding their duties without any consultation from them. This style is not very popular with the subordinates and is only effective if the leader has discharge knowledge regarding the subject as well as definiti ve plans regarding how to execute the project. This style is looked raft upon and should only be dod on the rarest of occasions when time is of the essence. It can be utilize within certain limits if the subordinate is unfamiliar with the job in order to guide them more effectively.ParticipativeThis is the suggested style of leadership within organizations as it makes sure all the manifold parties are interpreted into account while making decisions. It is used when the leader knows about the final goal but wants to discuss the different options regarding procedures required to complete the goals. In this style the subordinates are informed of the goal by the leader and then an interactive discussion is carried out regarding how to achieve the stated goals. raze though all the subordinates are taken into circumstance the leader remains in firm control and is the one who determines the plan of action based on the stimulant drug provided by the subordinates. This style is mutual ly beneficial and ensures an environment of teamwork which leads to better performance.DelegatingThis is when the leader leaves the decision up to the subordinates. This style is usually used when the employees are more informed regarding the subject than the leader and can prove the situation better and come up with a better plan regarding what needs to be done. Even though the employee is the one taking the decision, it is still the leaders responsibility. The leader still has to delegate tasks in this style. This style is only suggested when the leader has complete confidence in the ability of his subordinates.Davis. R.V.Tim Luthans. F. (1979) envisioned a model consisting of quaternary basic styles called the decision style model. These styles included Directive, Analytic, Behavioral and Conceptual.DirectiveThis is an autocratic style which is usually choose when the leader has a need for power. Such kind of leadership style is more effective in situations where subordinates are ill informed or ill equipped for the task at hand. The model focuses on technical decisions and leaders do not consult and take very less(prenominal) advice from the subordinates. The leaders who practice this style are very performance oriented and therefore they operate with a lot of control. They tend to be aggressive and tend to achieve their desired results by hook or by crook. They also tend to have very dominating personalities.AnalyticThis type of leader is a lot less authoritative than the directive type of leader and has more tolerance for ambiguity. They also tend to have more approachable attitude as they tend to want input from everywhere before reaching a decision. This style is best suited for the ability to cope with new situations which is why this system is an efficient problem solver. These leaders are usually not too hasty with decisions and take their time in evaluating all their options.ConceptualThis style uses data from various sources and analyzes all p ossible solutions with great details and looks at each and every secondary. It is quite similar to the behavioral style. The relationship between the leader and his team is one of receptiveness and trust. The leaders are usually idealists therefore ethics and values play a key role. They have a long range focus and have high amounts of organizational commitment. They are usually understanding towards their team and adapt well according to different situations. They tend to like to have less control and tend to encourage a team effort and participation on an equal level. They want to see their team develop as a whole and even though they are achievement oriented they value independence as well.BehavioralThe managers who practice this style of leadership are highly concerned with their workers well being and tend to be a great source of support for their employees as they are highly people oriented. They are very open and easy to communicate with. They are also willing to compromise more and can be persuaded and welcome suggestions. All these qualities show that they tend to have disconnected control. They aim to be accepted and liked and avoid conflicts. They have a low data input.Hunt. J. G. (1971) discover through his study that an ineffective leader leads to conflicts on multiple levels as well as a highly uninviting work environment both of which lead to organizational inefficiency. The overall environment functions ban as employees do not take their managers seriously and through study it can be concluded that leadership requirement at different levels of management may vary markedly. It seems presumable that when a leader has enough knowledge of two different types of management level then they perform better as compare to managers who have knowledge of only one management level, but definite kind of knowledge is likely to be dependent on various kinds of situations. Many managers use penalties which instill fear of mistakes within the employees. Au thoritative leaders may cut days off, yell and demean their workers and abuse their power. They feel that affright their employees and increasing their authority will lead to more productivity however what happens is that there is more tension, employees become scared, morale falls and the organizational performance is affected. The autocratic style of leadership is greatly discouraged within organizations and should only be used when dealing with new employees who are unfamiliar with the organizational culture as it does not work well with the more experienced employees as suggested by research. A separate style of leadership is a laissez-fare style in which the leader does not manage his employees and only guides them. This happens only when the employees themselves select an informal leader for guidance.All these different styles of leaderships are suited to different environments. A behavioral style index be very successful in a certain environment yet might fail abysmally in another so a good leader adapts to these different environments with different styles. Therefore not all leaders are successful in all environments which is why certain leaders are chosen for certain situations. Spillane. J.P., Halverson R Diamond. B. J (2004) proposed this approach is not a practicable option in the current day scenario as there is constant change. He suggests that leaders should now be chosen for their ability to deal with a wide range of tactics and that leaders should become more efficient in applying tactics rather than approaching different styles of leaderships. He also states that extremes of tractability and rigidity are the least efficient styles. According to Fielder (1967) almost anything is easier to change than a managers style which is why a leader should not pretend to be something they are not. Leaders who act as facilitators are most liked among the followers and are most easy to understand. Flexible leaders also tend to adapt more easily to new situations compared to rigid ones. Efficient Flexibility doesnt mean a change in personality, all it is, is a change in tactics.Situational LeadershipThe objective of this review paper is to explain effective leadership in different situations and its role in a firm. It is essential to elaborate few theories which have substantial importance in Organizational Behavior literature. Situational leaders are those who can coordinate, guide, handle and direct his team members in all kinds of known and unknown situations (situational factors). There are few aspects which lead to situational decisions such as motivation and capability of followers. This, in turn, is affected by factors within the particular situation. Another factor which may affect leaders behavior is the relationship shared between followers and leader.According to the situational theory purposed by Hersey and Blanchard (1969) leader should be able to motivate his followers in order to make them perform their task effici ently and effectively. Leaders should work in a way that they will motivate their followers and increase their development level. On the basis of these lines they have come up with four-spot leadership styles that are consistent with the four development levels for followers. 1) S1 Telling / directing when in a team followers are unable to understand the task and afraid to perform their duties then the leader will guide and coordinate them properly. Leaders in this situation identify the real problem occurring to the follower and try to solve it. Leaders uphold the position of boss so that all assignments will be done properly within time. 2) S2 Selling / coaching when the follower is able to understand his task to some extent and he looks confident in this, then telling him will be equal to discouraging them. So in this type of situations leaders have to guide his team members very carefully and instead of telling, the leaders have to sell the techniques of working, explaining and clarifying decisions. First two styles are more leader oriented. 3) S3 Participating / bread and butter when followers can perform and they dont show the results then leaders have to be very patient role and deal this situation with expertise. Leaders should find out different ways to motivate the followers and if reasons of not showing performance would have been found then leaders should tackle them properly. 4) S4 Delegating / Observing in this type of situations followers know their jobs and they dont need any guidance but still its important for leaders to keep a check on the performance of the followers in order to ensure that everything move according to the set plan.Bruno Leo F.C. (2006) explained the profile of leadership styles of Brazilian supervisors or CEO based on the situational leadership styles purposed by Hersey et al (1969). In his paper he elucidated that results showed that most of the executives are seen accepting the styles S2 (48.29% relative frequency di stribution) and S3 (28.60% frequency distribution). So this shows that they have capabilities of working with followers of average level of willingness. Though they sometimes event problems regarding discipline and work with groups. focusing theorists of the past tried to discover the best form of leadership for all situations however modern day researchers have realized that different environments lead to a significant impact on the effectiveness of a leader. Fielder (1967) carried out extensive research regarding how different situations affect leadership effectiveness. According to his research the relations motivated manager is most effective where the leader doesnt need much power whereas the task related manager performs well when his relations with his employees are good and when he has a strong control. In an unfavorable condition incomplete of the leaders would be effective so an alternative solution would be to replace the leader.In order to provide a solution for the st yle-situation issue vroom Jago, Arthur. G (2007) found an approach that dealt with the interaction between the leader and his subordinates. The model suggested that situation played a great role for a style to be effective. It also concluded that subordinate motivation and technical effectiveness play a key role in sharing of leader power and if neither of these are important than the leader himself takes the decision. If motivation is low but technical difficulties are still important then the leader tries to gain more information and if technical difficulty is not important and motivation is high then delegation might be the answer. Lastly if the problem level is high and a need for acceptance is present then the decision is shared within the group. This shows that there is a dead body in the behavior in different situations. Sometimes interpersonal behavioral patterns are also transferred when work performances change in order to meet new requirements. Different task demands als o lead to changes in leaders. Another point of view regarding styles of leaders is one of Fiedler (1974).Fenwick F Jing, Avery, G.C. (2008) found out trough their research that it is very difficult to define the relationship of leadership-performance. After doing concentrated research they accepted the four leadership paradigms as a tool of measurement the concept of leadership, (visionary, transactional, classical and organic paradigms).Avery (2001) identified 13 indices to measure these above mentioned leadership paradigms out of which 9 were used in the research of Fenwick F Jing, Avery, G.C. (2008). Many researchers who are constantly working on defining the leadership concept in groups have been able to link it with functional approach. In functional approach the main target of a leader is to get the job done and increase the level of performance. Thus, in such kind of approach leader ensures that every task should be completed in time. All team members actively participate in order to accomplish the task. The main objective of a leader behind this approach is to complete the functions, while leadership can be categorized as a way of problem solving achieved by common responses to social problems. In order to understand the functions four broad types of functions have been identified 1) well informed and organize team, 2) proper use of information in hand to solve the problems, 3) managing and control human resources, and 4) proper use of resources. Burke, C. S., Stagl, K. C., Klein, C., Goodwin, G. F., Salas, E., Halpin, S. M. (2006).Several studies show that the leader faces few obstacles regarding the organizational life cycle. There are five different stages of an organization and the changes which include, changes in management focus, organizational structure, top management style, control system and reward emphasis. Things that added to these changes and do the decision process harder included the size and age of the organization, its stage of evolution and the growth rate of the industry. developed numbers of management scholars have debated the effectiveness of leadership styles, behaviors and situations when selecting measurements of performance there is a correlation between financial performance and customer satisfaction. Several reasons indicate that there should be a relationship between leadership and performance. The first reason relates to practice. Todays intensive, dynamic markets feature innovation-based competition, price/performance rivalry, decreasing returns, and the creative last of existing competencies therefore effective leadership behaviors can facilitate the improvement of performance when organizations face these new challenges. Lumijrvi.I. (2007). Understanding the effects of leadership on performance is also important because leadership is viewed as one of the key driving forces for improving a firms performance.The Contingency Model of Leadership EffectivenessIn this scratch contingency theory has been described which was actually originated by Fiedler. Fiedler. E. Fred (1972). Contingency theory helps executives and leaders to motivate and guide their followers in order to get better results for an organization. This theory is all about how leaders lead their groups in different situations, which predict followers capabilities and behaviors. There are few similarities between Contingency theory and situational theory. Former deals with the ability of leaders and see how they handle their followers to achieve high organizational performance in all kinds of situations. Also there is an important difference between the two theories. Situational Theory is more focused towards the behavior of the leader, depending upon the situations (often about follower behavior) whereas contingency theory talks about the bigger take care and it embraces group aspects about leader competence and other variables within the situation.This model was purposed by Fiedler in (1964) and (1974). According to this model they have explained two categories of motivational oriented leaders i.e. one is the task-motivated leaders and second category is relationship- motivated leaders. Author described that whenever some unexpected situation occurs in an organization both types of leaders react or respond to the situation differently. Many researchers have worked on this model and proves that leaders with task-motivated orientation mostly perform effectively in all types of situations, whereas leaders which fall into the second category (relationship-motivated) perform best in situations in which their control and influence is moderate. They further elaborated that leaders performance is lManagement Leadership Styles TescoManagement Leadership Styles TescoExecutive SummaryThe retail organisation whose management and leadership styles will be investigated is Tesco PLC. One will be analysing the management and leadership styles that are currently used by Tesco and whether these styl es are effective, and also recommend if they could change or adopt any new styles which may be of more benefit to them.1.0 IntroductionTesco PLC is one of the leading retailers in the United Kingdom and one of the largest food retailers in the world. Tesco has diversified by also selling non-food goods, such as electrical and also clothes in their stores. The initial size of the company indicates that the types of management and leadership styles and the way these are handled are crucial for the success of this firm.Similar to most companies, the management and leadership styles adopted within Tesco are likely to have continuously been adapted in correlation with the growth of the company over the years. Although the current management style has evidently been successful here in the UK, it is highly likely that they would not be able to use this same management style in certain countries overseas, namely Japan and chinaware. The primary reason for this is due to the different cultu res and values which have been adopted by these respective countries and this is something that will be taken into account. The management and leadership styles analysed below, are approaches which are likely to be implemented by Tesco.2.0 Management Leadership definitionManagement is the organisational process that includes strategic planning, setting objectives, managing recourses, deploying the human and financial assets needed to achieve objectives, and measuring results (Stuhlman Management Consultants, 2007). Boddy (2005) defines management as the activity of getting things done with the aid of people and other recourses. Mintzberg (1973) makes this definition even simpler by stating, if you ask a manager what he does, he they will most likely tell you that he plans, organizes, coordinates and controlsHannagan (1995) states that Leadership can be seen as performing the influencing function of management, largely involved with establishing goals and motivating people to help a chieve them. Leaders decide where we are going rather than describe how we are going to get there.House (2004) states that leadership is the ability of an individual to influence, motivate, and enable others to contribute toward the effectiveness and success of the organizations of which they are members.For a manager to make his/her subordinates work effectively, the have to be motivated. Motivation is a key factor that must be held by a manager or a leader because a de-motivated workforce leads to lower productivity. A manager keeping his workforce motivated is ensuring that his/her subordinates are working at a high level of productivity. Masterson and Pickton (2004) define motivation as the complex relationship between needs, drives and goals It is therefore ideal for a manager or leader to identify the needs, find out what drives workers, and subsequently, set them goals.3.0 McGregors Theory X and YOne of the most influential theories on the understanding of leadership is creat ed by the work of Douglas McGregor (1960) in developing theories X and Y. He believed that managers took two different views of their subordinates and conducted practices that would best suit their premise of the workers they were in charge of.Theory X managers, take the thinking that people dislike work, and only work as it is a necessity for survival. They perceive workers to be lazy people who want to avoid responsibility, who insufficiency ambition and would prefer to be directed, rather then use initiative to take roles of responsibility. Mainly, these managers believe people want security from there jobs, therefore the managers take a very directive approach to leadership and are very strict and controlling with their subordinates. Organisational goals already established and workers are pushed in a certain direction so that these goals can be fully achieved.On the other hand, Theory Y managers take an vastly different view to the theory X style of management. Theory Y mana gers believe that people see work as a daily occurrence and actually accept and strive to have some responsibility. They believe that if workers are in the right conditions, they will work hard their own will, assist the organization achieve the set out goals, and in return, being rewarded for this hard work and effort. In this scenario, managers will work together with subordinates, deciding work objectives and by developing strategies designed to achieve these goals. They will encourage team working and also delegate decision making when and were possible.In relation to Tesco, the management are likely to take a theory X approach in running their organisation. Due to the outrageousness of the number of subordinates a manager is likely to be in supervision of, it would be almost out of the question to use the latter approach. Furthermore, the tasks needed to be carried out by workers do not require many skills, for example condescend floor duties such as shelf stacking, checkout s and sales assistants carry out basic duties. As a result, these workers would need constant supervision and direction to ensure consistency and continuity in order to achieve the firms goals. Therefore, for Tesco, a theory X approach to management in their stores is the most effective management style.4.0 Ohio State University ModelThe initiating structure is the pattern of leadership behaviour that emphasises the performance of the work in hand and the achievement of production or service goals. Boddy (2005) states This behaviour involves the managers concern for directing subordinates in order to achieve production targets. It is a task-oriented approach, where managers tend to be highly directive and emphasise completing a task according to plan. This behavioural approach to leadership relates to Tesco in that, managers at Tesco are more concerned with getting the job done and reaching store targets rather then taking a consideration dimension which involves more the concern fo r people. Boddy (2005) states that typical behaviours includedAllocating subordinates to specific tasksEstablishing standards of job performanceInforming subordinates of the requirements of the jobScheduling work to be done by subordinatesEncouraging the use of uniform procedures5.0 Blake and Moutons Management football fieldThe management grid identifies a range of management behaviours based on various ways that task-oriented and employee-orientated styles can interact with each other. When looking at Appendix 1, in relation to Tesco, the management would identify themselves mostly to an Authoritarian management style (also known as produce or perish style), which has a high concern for production and efficiency and concentrates less on people. They take a task oriented approach which takes in hand the needs of the task in hand rather then the wants of subordinates. This is once again, similar again to the Theory X approach stated approach, and is effective to Tesco where there is a larger amount of lower-skilled employees.6.0 Herzberg dickens Factor TheoryHerzberg was interested in discovering how need satisfaction occurs in a workplace and the impact of motivation on behaviours and attitudes. Fincham and Rhodes (2005) stated that Herzbergs two factor theory involved, firstly the motivators and secondly the hygiene factors. hygiene factors involved supervision, salary, work environment, company policies and relationship with colleagues. The absences of these were seen as dissatisfying aspects of a job which can affect the morale of workers. Herzberg stated that this is followed by several motivators, which include responsibility, achievement, promotion and recognition. In relation to Tesco, subordinates of the managers such as shop floor employees, are unlikely to achieve the motivators stated by Herzberg, therefore are likely to be dissatisfied and de-motivated in their jobs. This can be very negative for a firm like Tesco as a de-motivated workforce i s obviously more unproductive then a motivated workforce. Taking this into thought, it is racy for managers to tackle motivational issues of the workforce and see that the hygiene factors of employees are met, making it an effective approach to adopt.7.0 remainder and RecommendationsAll in all, the evident success of Tesco shows that the management and leadership styles they are using are immensely successful. Management styles used such as the Theory X approach and authoritarian management are undoubtedly operating well. However, a 2007 DataMonitor Company report based on Tesco states that Tesco are looking to branch out into foreign countries such as Japan and China, and as a result, they may well have to reconsider the management and leadership strategies which they have in place. The reason for this is that the world of work differs in Japan and China compared to that of the UK as they place a large amount of emphasis on Total Quality Management (TQM), also know as Kaizen. Thi s is a well renowned dodging in these countries and has become some what of a norm for workers there. As a result, it maybe wise for Tesco to implement a similar strategy to adopt and emulate already successful strategies used in Japan and China. Total Quality Management is an operational philosophy that stresses commitment to customer satisfaction and continuous improvement, TQM is committed to quality and excellence and to being the best in all functions. Hunger Wheelen (2003) state that in order for TQM to succeed in a company, the program usually involves a significant change in corporate culture, requiring strong leadership from top management, employee training, empowerment of lower level employees (giving people more control over their work), and teamwork. In order for Tesco to implement such a strategy, they may have to discard the autocratic management approach and may have adopt a more democratic style of management, in which the wishes and suggestions of the members are incorporated into those of the leader, as stated by Huczynski and Buchanan (1991). Although it may be hard to change from a management style which has been ever so successful for the firm, it may be crucial to adopt a new strategy in order for Tesco to be successful in their foreign ventures.8.0 ReferencesAcademic TextbooksBoddy, D (2005). Management An Introduction. 3rd Edition. Essex FT learner Hall.House, R Hanges, P Javidan, M Dorfman, P Gupta, V. (2004) Culture, Leadership, and Organizations The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies, SAGE Publications, Thousand OaksHannagan, T (1995). Management Concepts and Practices. 2nd Edition. London Pitman Publishing.Hunger, J Wheelen, T (2005). Essentials of Strategic Management. 3rd Edition. Essex Pearson Education Inc.Huczynski, A Buchanan, D (1991). Organizational Behaviour. 2nd Edition. Hertfordshire, Cambridge University Press.Fincham, R Rhodes, P (2005). Principles of Organisational Behaviour. 4th Edition, Oxford, Oxford University PressMi ntzberg, H. (1973) The Nature of Managerial Work, harpist and Row, New YorkMasterson, R Pickton, D (2004) Principles of Marketing, Berkshire, McGraw Hill grumble NotesMeyer, M CORP 2463, Week 4 Lecture Notes Leadership, Influence and Power (2007), De Montfort University